System for increasing betting level of profitability and methods of use

ABSTRACT

A system for increasing the betting level of profitability via a bet information advisor platform and methods of use, a computer platform having applications to select or identify Bet Information data sources, assign an Age consistency score to each Bet Information data source based on age of source assign a ROI score to each Bet Information data source for each match or game outcome based on profits earned or lost, assign or calculate an Overall Efficiency score for each Bet Information data sources based on Age consistency score and ROI grade/percentage score, utilize Bet Information data sources with an Overall Efficiency score greater than or equal to Threshold for current plays or bets, allocate x%/y%/z% plays or bets to Bet Information data sources 1x/2x/3x Threshold, track each losing positons and the Bet Information data sources associated therewith, assign an increased Risk Amount to the losing Bet Information data sources.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

To the full extent permitted by law, the present United StatesNon-provisional Patent Application hereby claims priority to and thefull benefit of, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/506,604, filed May15, 2017, entitled “Method of Increasing the Betting Public or SportsInvestors Level of Profitability”, and U.S. Provisional Application No.62/637,171, filed Mar. 1, 2018, entitled “Method of Increasing theBetting Public or Sports Investors Level of Profitability”, which areincorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure relates generally to a system to utilize bettinginformation and, more specifically, to utilize betting information andbiometrics to increase chances or odds of obtaining a better thanaverage level of profitability.

BACKGROUND

Currently, in the betting industry the betting pubic including theexperienced sports betting investor (Bettor) searches for free andpurchased data or advice (Bet Information) in order to gain an advantageon certain bet types, such as a risk or position against the spread, onthe money line, on the total, on their fantasy sports mock draftlineup/team, or a combination of two or more risk or positions known asa combo risk/bet “Parlay” or “Teaser” or Pari-Mutuel risk. When theBettor looks to obtain the sought after Bet Information they eventuallycome across numerous websites or handicapping information outlets thatsimply over load the Bettor with an assortment of data, trends, powerrankings, game simulators or fantasy sports mock draft line upprojections. Moreover, the Bettor seeking Bettor Information will comeacross bet advisor or sports handicapper individuals, also known astipsters, sports bet advisors/experts (Bet Advisors), who pushperformance records or profit margins, which only mention recentperformance data or hot streaks without providing long term data andtrends.

The majority of the Bettor Information provided by these companiesentices a Bettor to over extend themselves financially, while theprovider of Bettor Information and Bet Advisors is only hoping to hit ahot streak of wins based thereon, so that the Bet Advisors or providersof Bettor Information service look to capitalize on a sale or revenuebased on a mirage of recent wins from the sports risk/risk or wagerpositon provided. One disadvantage of this approach is that a largeportion of Bettors who lose are left holding the financial deficit basedon losses and poor money management guidance from these Bet Advisors orproviders of Bettor Information services.

Another disadvantage of this approach is that Bet Advisors or providersof Bettor Information services misleads in one way or another, byexhibiting false winning streaks, while only mentioning recent wins andnot losses.

Still another disadvantage of this approach is that Bet Advisors orproviders of Bettor Information services who provide accurate wins andlosses do not truly represent the profit and loss in the form ofaccurate dollars risk and paid out as they all grade wins on payoutswith odds of −101 up to −300 odds as a $100 payout when the true payouton a win with −120 odds for example is $83.33 not $100. Therefore allhandicapper profits expressed are not 100% accurate and somewhatmisleading.

Still another disadvantage of this approach is that Bet Advisors orproviders of Bettor Information services offer Free positions on amatch, game or mock draft or free data to allow the public or bettor theopportunity to sample their service but most of these services do notinclude the Free Pick or position as a graded result within their leaderboard totals or overall tracked records, for the services that evenattempt to track data or handicapper performance.

Furthermore, no existing Bet Advisors or providers of Bettor Informationservices offer enough data to give the typical bettor or sports investoran advantage to perform above the historical average level of profits onvery popular risk or bets such as Parlays or Combo bet Teasers ortracked and monitored advice on Fantasy Football, baseball andbasketball data lineups and mock drafts.

To this end various these Bet Advisors or providers of BettorInformation services to promote successful handicapper, data andinformational advice, but none break down every aspect and componentneeded in order to profit at a higher rate that is clearly documented atsources such as gaming.unlv.edu as an example.

Therefore, it is readily apparent that there is a recognizable unmetneed for a system for increasing the betting level of profitability andmethods of use. This system and method perform the appropriate functionsto provide long term Bettor Information performance data and trendsalong with recent performance data or hot streaks Bettor Informationproviding the Bettor with full picture data and trends without theenticements to over extend themselves financially. Moreover, this systemand method perform the appropriate functions to avoid uninformedfinancial deficit based on losses and poor money management guidancefrom these Bet Advisors or providers of Bettor Information services.Furthermore, this system and method perform the appropriate functions toaccurately exhibit or disclose winning streaks and losing streaks andnot just mentioning recent wins.

Still furthermore, this system and method perform the appropriatefunctions to accurately exhibit or disclose profits and losses in theform of accurate dollars risked and true payout on a win and not gradewins with odds. Yet still furthermore, this system and method performthe appropriate functions to accurately exhibit or disclose Freepositions on a match, game or mock draft or free data as a graded resultwithin their leader board totals or overall tracked records. Yet stillfurthermore, this system and method perform the appropriate functions toaccurately exhibit or disclose Bettor Information with the objective toperform above the historical average level of profits on very popularrisk or bets such as Parlays or Combo bet Teasers or tracked andmonitored advice on Fantasy Football, baseball and basketball datalineups and mock drafts. Yet still furthermore, this system and methodperform the appropriate functions to accurately exhibit or discloseBettor Information with the objective to break down every aspect andcomponent of handicapper, data and informational advice needed in orderto profit at a higher rate.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Briefly described, in example embodiment, the present system and methodovercomes the above-mentioned disadvantages, and meets the recognizedneed for a system for increasing the betting level of profitability viaa bet information advisor platform and methods of use, including, ingeneral, a computer platform having applications to select or identifyBet Information data sources, assign an Age grade/consistency score toeach Bet Information data source (game, match or mock draft player stat)based on age of source (older source lower score), assign a ROIgrade/percentage score to each Bet Information data source for eachmatch or game outcome based on profits earned or lost (categorized bysport that turn a profit or loss), assign or calculate an OverallEfficiency score for each Bet Information data sources based on Agegrade/consistency score and ROI grade/percentage score, utilize BetInformation data sources with an Overall Efficiency score greater thanor equal to Threshold for current plays or bets (selecting team orteams, risk levels, bet types), allocate x%/y%/z% plays or bets to BetInformation data sources 1x/2x/3x Threshold, track each losingpositons/picks/wagers and the Bet Information data sources associatedtherewith, assign an increased Risk Amount to the losing Bet Informationdata sources.

According to its major aspects and broadly stated, the method/system forincreasing the betting level of profitability via a bet informationadvisor platform and methods of use, including, in general, a computerplatform having applications to select or identify Bet Information datasources, assign an Age grade/consistency score to each Bet Informationdata source (game, match or mock draft player stat) based on age ofsource (older source lower score), assign a ROI grade/percentage scoreto each Bet Information data source for each match or game outcome basedon profits earned or lost (categorized by sport that turn a profit orloss), assign or calculate an Overall Efficiency score for each BetInformation data sources based on Age grade/consistency score and ROIgrade/percentage score, determine a biological or psychological state ofa Bettor, utilize Bet Information data sources with an OverallEfficiency score greater than or equal to Threshold for current plays orbets (selecting team or teams, risk levels, bet types), allocatex%/y%/z% plays or bets to Bet Information data sources 1x/2x/3xThreshold, track each losing positons/picks/wagers and the BetInformation data sources associated therewith, assign an increased RiskAmount to the losing Bet Information data sources.

In an exemplary embodiment a computer system to raise the betting levelprofitability of a bettor, the computer system including, a memorydevice for storing an instruction, a processor in communication with thememory and configured to execute the instruction the processor receivesa bet data from a bet data source, the processor receives a bet type,the processor executes an instruction to assign a consistency score foreach the bet data source, the processor executes an instruction todetermine a return on investment percentage score for each the bet datasource, the processor executes an instruction to determine an overallefficiency score for each the bet data source based on the consistencyscore and the return on investment percentage score for each the betdata source, the processor executes an instruction to select each thebet data source data source having the overall efficiency score greaterthan or equal to four, the processor executes an instruction to elect acurrent day bet utilizing the bet data source data source having theoverall efficiency score greater than or equal to four, the processorexecutes an instruction to track the bet data source having a losingposition, and the processor executes an instruction to detrimentallyincrement a risk amount of the bet data source for a subsequent bet.

In an exemplary embodiment a method of raising the betting levelprofitability of a bettor, the method utilizing a computer processor toexecute an instruction including the steps of inputting bet data from abet data source, inputting a bet type, assigning a consistency score foreach the bet data source, determining a return on investment percentagescore for each the bet data source, determining an overall efficiencyscore for each the bet data source based on the consistency score andthe return on investment percentage score for each the bet data source,selecting each the bet data source data source having the overallefficiency score greater than or equal to four, electing a current daybet utilizing the bet data source data source having the overallefficiency score greater than or equal to four, tracking the bet datasource having a losing position, and incrementing a risk amount of thebet data source for a subsequent bet.

Accordingly, a feature of the system for increasing the betting level ofprofitability via a bet information advisor platform and methods of useis the ability to provide long term Bettor Information performance dataand trends along with recent performance data or hot streaks BettorInformation providing the Bettor with full picture data and trendswithout the enticements to over extend themselves financially.

Another feature of the system for increasing the betting level ofprofitability via a bet information advisor platform and methods of useis the ability to avoid uninformed financial deficit based on losses andpoor money management guidance from these Bet Advisors or providers ofBettor Information services.

Still another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toaccurately exhibit or disclose winning streaks and losing streaks andnot just mentioning recent wins.

Still another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the to accuratelyexhibit or disclose profits and losses in the form of accurate dollarsrisked and true payout on a win and not grade wins with odds.

Still another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toperform the appropriate functions to accurately exhibit or disclose Freepositions on a match, game or mock draft or free data as a graded resultwithin their leader board totals or overall tracked records.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toperform the appropriate functions to accurately exhibit or discloseBettor Information with the objective to perform above the historicalaverage level of profits on very popular risk or bets such as Parlays orCombo bet Teasers or tracked and monitored advice on Fantasy Football,baseball and basketball data lineups and mock drafts.

Yet another feature the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toaccurately exhibit or disclose Bettor Information with the objective tobreak down every aspect and component of handicapper, data andinformational advice needed in order to profit at a higher rate.

Yet another feature of the feature the betting level of profitabilityvia a bet information advisor platform and methods of use is the abilityto provide Sports Bettor, Fantasy Sports Team manager, Sports Hedge FundManager or Sports Book Line Maker who actively seek Free or PurchasedData and Handicapper or Expert Advice in order to increase their chancesor odds of obtaining a better than average level of Profitability. Yetanother feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toinclude at least one computer processor, data base and user interfacewhich would be included or considered an Agricultural, Assistive,Balancing, Banking, Biotechnological, Building, Cybernetics, Cleanroom,Cleaning Method, Drilling, Domestic Implements, Educational, Electronic,Emerging, Energy, Environmental, Equipment, Explosive, Film/video,Financial, Food, Gas Turbine, Geographical, Home Automation, Industry,Information and Communications, Inventive, Lubrication, Machinery,Medical, Micro, Military, Mining, Missile, Music, Nano, Political,Primitive, Rail, Scientific, Sound, Space, Sports, Tools, Transport,Travel, Vehicle, Waste, Alternative, Architectural, Creative,Disruptive, HighTech, Industrial, Low, Micro, and Open SourceTechnologies.

Yet another feature of betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability tocommunication with the platform via Video/Live video, website, mobileapplication coding, text messaging or any form of direct messagingsocial media site or application, telephone, artificial intelligence ormental telepathy mediums.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of us is the ability to providethe end user with options to enter personal information, total bankrollor risk investment levels for a given time period.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toprovide the end user with the option to select the risk or investmenttype and the information or advice type, ranging from Parlays, Teasers,straight positions against the spread, totals or fantasy sports mockdraft lineups and also if these are positions before game time, Live Betor 2nd half positons as Live bet or even second half data or advice.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toprovide the end user with the option to select sports leagues, teams orplayers that they would like to see within the risk or bet typeselected. Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability viaa bet information advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toprovide Bettor services to novice or average sports bettor, or investor,including a sports hedge fund manager/sports investment broker/advisor,government agency, sports book/casino odds or lines setter as currentlydefined under Nevada law, in order to gain an advantage against theaverage level of profits historically tracked as an industry average andto regulate a fair and ethical means of sports risk position advisementand fund management.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toprovide Bettor services to handicapping firm or investment firm or fundlooking to formulate a higher efficiency output for clientele orinvestors by grading voluntarily submitted risk positions fromindividual, partnered, employed or contracted handicapper or dataproviding outfits for straight, parlay/combo and pari-mutuel risk orbetting advice.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toutilize the efficiency score in the logic to reward data source outlets,handicappers, sports investment risk algorithmic creators or any sportsinvestment risk advisor/broker with a revenue sharing plan or ownershipoption (form of salary, bonus and or stock options in the governingcompany or firm) in the governing company or firm based on the totalpercentage (%) that data source/ advisor contributes or the amount ofdata provided which impacts the firm or funds overall revenue fromproduction or sales for a given time period.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability tocompensate for performance on social media or forum contest. Theplatform and method can treat individual social media or forum users asconsultants or handicappers to compensate based on contest orinstructive performance using a crypto currency or any establishedcurrency means of exchange. This form of compensation is different thanestablished rebate, affiliate or forum/social media/application contest,as the internet/social media user, looking to grow their projectionforecasting or performance ability does not have to make a purchase tobe compensated nor do they have to engage outside of their respectiveinternet or social media outlet in an inconvenient manner, also theuser/contestant/handicapper in training does not have to make outrageousmultiple selections in one single day or very limited timeframe in orderto perform or engage in contest or to provide data to the overallapplication scoring model. The crypto currency or token used tocompensate would obtain an established value from partners of the firmwho send assets to handicapping firm, sports risk investment firm, hedgefund, marketing outlet or any other company using the system, platformor method.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability tocompensate for pooled revenue sharing, especially for revenue generatedand utilized amongst numerous advisors or data sources for combinationrisk performance such as Parlay/Teaser/Combo bet positions or fantasysport team lineups or even straight risk position data that contributeto a company or single fund(s) performance that is awarded by investorsor clients after profits are generated as a performance fee orpercentage retained by the company as a percentage (%) of total assetsbeing managed.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability to searchinternationally pulling information from sports media, handicappingservices, fantasy sports advisors or any outlet that provides a side orposition on daily professional and collegiate level sporting events,where the dated outlet states a one sided position.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability to tagand store the data by outlet provider or handicapper identifier or subprovider and then grade each position against the actual outcome of thematch or sports player's final numbers or stats within the match orgame.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability todictate the true profit or loss earned or lost based on the odds orweight set by the average casino sports book or line maker and store thetrue profit or loss earned or lost based on the odds or weight in thedata base, and the actual paid out amount on wins to be logged with thedata outlet providers position.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability to beutilized by gaming and sportsbook companies to aid clientele to be amore responsible and disciplined in comparison to the average bettor,which in turn will yield a longer term, tenured betting public andsports investing environment.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability to enablea more experienced sports investor/bettor to integrate the system withtheir sportsbook or gaming market that usually sets the price for eachposition on sporting events/matches and fantasy sports. The sportsinvestor may then use the system to track their own positions onspecific risk and wagers and provide a formulated assessment andefficiency grade of that sports investor or sports hedge fund manager'sgame or fantasy simulated positions. For the professional or end userthat wants to become a professional Sports bet position advisor orbroker and or sports bet fund manager the efficiency tracker beingutilized for their own personal assessment may be formulated withcertification test interface that takes the end user through a series oftesting questions on sports investment ethics.

The certification testing may include a scoring model against knowledgeon acquiring client leads and customer acquisitions, knowledge anddifference between offsetting an earlier stake on a given match or riskposition by taking an opposite position on the same match in order tocut losses or maximize profits; in comparison to bad ethical advisementof the public or investors be dictating positions on a given match orrisk playing both sides of the same bet or risk in effort to solelycapitalize on the volumes that the sports betting market offers bygiving one client one position and another client/end user/investor theopposite position on the same bet in hopes of putting together a fewwinners or profits for one client to generate broker or sports investorrevenue, while the other client/investor takes losses at the sameexpense. Testing portion will also assess the prospective sportsinvestment advisor of money management knowledge when coinciding withsports risk positioning when it comes to an end user or clientsfinancial status when under advisement from the sports investmentbroker. Also sports investor testing on properly executing riskpositions on behalf of clients under advisement while using the sportsbook integration function within the method described. Sports investmentcertification may be awarded once the prospective sports advisor brokerfund manager has reached a certain score on the testing portionformulated with an efficiency score dictated by the handicappingefficiency logic.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toutilize the system as the standard exchange for ethical sportsinvestment advice monitoring and tracking and scoring.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toprovide LIVE betting or real time betting options providing a similarefficiency graded formula for end users to get real time positionsduring a game or match against the current LIVE betting or 2nd half oddson the market.

Yet another feature of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use is the ability toprovide a text message or any form of direct messaging format as well.

These and other features of the betting level of profitability via a betinformation advisor platform and methods of use will become moreapparent to one skilled in the art from the following DetailedDescription of exemplary embodiments and Claims when read in light ofthe accompanying drawing Figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present betting level of profitability via a bet information advisorplatform and methods of use will be better understood by reading theDetailed Description of exemplary embodiments with reference to theaccompanying drawing figures, in which like reference numerals denotesimilar structure and refer to like elements throughout, and in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computer system of the present disclosureof a bet information advisor platform;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a communications system implemented by thecomputer system in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a system and flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment ofbetting level of profitability system implemented on the bet informationadvisor platform shown in FIGS. 1 and 2;

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the digitalmulti-dimensional image platform shown in FIG. 3; and

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the digitalmulti-dimensional image platform shown in FIG. 3 with one or more inputimagery applications.

It is to be noted that the drawings presented are intended solely forthe purpose of illustration and that they are, therefore, neitherdesired nor intended to limit the disclosure to any or all of the exactdetails of construction shown, except insofar as they may be deemedessential to the claimed invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In describing the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, asillustrated in FIGS. 1-5, specific terminology is employed for the sakeof clarity. The present disclosure, however, is not intended to belimited to the specific terminology so selected, and it is to beunderstood that each specific element includes all technical equivalentsthat operate in a similar manner to accomplish similar functions. Theclaimed invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms andshould not be construed to be limited to the embodiments set forthherein. The examples set forth herein are non-limiting examples, and aremerely examples among other possible examples.

In order to understand the present disclosure certain variables need tobe defined. The object field is the entire image being composed. The“key subject point” is defined as the point where the scene converges,i.e., the point in the depth of field that always remains in focus andhas no parallax differential. The foreground and background point arethe closest point and furthest point from the viewer, respectively. Thedepth of field is the depth or distance created within the object field(depicted distance from foreground to background). The principal axis isthe line perpendicular to the scene passing through the key subjectpoint. The parallax is the displacement of the key subject point fromthe principal axis. In digital composition the displacement is alwaysmaintained as a whole integer number of pixels from the principal axis.

As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the presentdisclosure may be embodied as a method, data processing system, orcomputer program product. Accordingly, the present disclosure may takethe form of an entirely hardware embodiment, entirely softwareembodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects.Furthermore, the present disclosure may take the form of a computerprogram product on a computer-readable storage medium havingcomputer-readable program code means embodied in the medium. Anysuitable computer readable medium may be utilized, including hard disks,ROM, RAM, CD-ROMs, electrical, optical, magnetic storage devices and thelike.

The present disclosure is described below with reference to flowchartillustrations of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer programproducts according to embodiments of the present disclosure. It will beunderstood that each block or step of the flowchart illustrations, andcombinations of blocks or steps in the flowchart illustrations, can beimplemented by computer program instructions or operations. Thesecomputer program instructions or operations may be loaded onto a generalpurpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable dataprocessing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions oroperations, which execute on the computer or other programmable dataprocessing apparatus, create means for implementing the functionsspecified in the flowchart block or blocks/step or steps.

These computer program instructions or operations may also be stored ina computer-usable memory that can direct a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions or operations stored in thecomputer-usable memory produce an article of manufacture includinginstruction means which implement the function specified in theflowchart block or blocks/step or steps. The computer programinstructions or operations may also be loaded onto a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus (processor) to cause a series ofoperational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmableapparatus (processor) to produce a computer implemented process suchthat the instructions or operations which execute on the computer orother programmable apparatus (processor) provide steps for implementingthe functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks/step or steps.

Accordingly, blocks or steps of the flowchart illustrations supportcombinations of means for performing the specified functions,combinations of steps for performing the specified functions, andprogram instruction means for performing the specified functions. Itshould also be understood that each block or step of the flowchartillustrations, and combinations of blocks or steps in the flowchartillustrations, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-basedcomputer systems, which perform the specified functions or steps, orcombinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions oroperations.

Computer programming for implementing the present disclosure may bewritten in various programming languages, database languages, and thelike. However, it is understood that other source or object orientedprogramming languages, and other conventional programming language maybe utilized without departing from the spirit and intent of the presentdisclosure.

Referring now to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a block diagram of acomputer system 10 that provides a suitable environment for implementingembodiments of the present disclosure. The computer architecture shownin FIG. 1 is divided into two parts—motherboard 100 and the input/output(I/0) devices 200. Motherboard 100 preferably includes subsystems orprocessor to execute an instruction(s) such as central processing unit(CPU) 102, a memory device, such as random access memory (RAM) 104,input/output (I/O) controller 108, and a memory device such as read-onlymemory (ROM) 106, also known as firmware, which are interconnected bybus 110. A basic input output system (BIOS) containing the basicroutines that help to transfer information between elements within thesubsystems of the computer is preferably stored in ROM 106, or operablydisposed in RAM 104. Computer system 10 further preferably includes I/Odevices 202, such as main storage device 214 for storing operatingsystem 204 and instructions or application program(s) 206, and display208 for visual output, and other I/O devices 212 as appropriate. Mainstorage device 214 preferably is connected to CPU 102 through a mainstorage controller (represented as 108) connected to bus 110. Networkadapter 210 allows the computer system to send and receive data throughcommunication devices or any other network adapter capable oftransmitting and receiving data over a communications link that iseither a wired, optical, or wireless data pathway. It is recognizedherein that central processing unit (CPU) 102 performs instructions,operations or commands stored in ROM 106 or RAM 104.

Many other devices or subsystems or other I/O devices 212 may beconnected in a similar manner, including but not limited to, devicessuch as microphone, speakers, flash drive, CD-ROM player, DVD player,printer, main storage device 214, such as hard drive, and/or modem eachconnected via an I/O adapter. Also, although preferred, it is notnecessary for all of the devices shown in FIG. 1 to be present topractice the present disclosure, as discussed below. Furthermore, thedevices and subsystems may be interconnected in different configurationsfrom that shown in FIG. 1, or may be based on optical or gate arrays, orsome combination of these elements that is capable of responding to andexecuting instructions or operations. The operation of a computer systemsuch as that shown in FIG. 1 is readily known in the art and is notdiscussed in further detail in this application, so as not toovercomplicate the present discussion.

Referring now to FIG. 2, there is illustrated a diagram depicting anexemplary communication system 201 in which concepts consistent with thepresent disclosure may be implemented. Examples of each element withinthe communication system 201 of FIG. 2 are broadly described above withrespect to FIG. 1. In particular, the server system 260 and user 220,222, 224 have attributes similar to computer system 10 of FIG. 1 andillustrate one possible implementation of computer system 10.Communication system 201 preferably includes one or more user 220, 222,224, one or more server system 260, and network 250, which could be, forexample, the Internet, public network, private network or cloud. User220, 222, 224 each preferably includes a computer-readable medium, suchas random access memory, coupled to a processor. The processor, CPU 102,executes program instructions or operations stored in memory.Communication system 201 typically includes one or more user 220, 222,224. For example, user 220, 222, 224 may include one or moregeneral-purpose computers (e.g., personal computers), one or morespecial purpose computers (e.g., devices specifically programmed tocommunicate with each other and/or the server system 260), aworkstation, a server, a device, a digital assistant or a “smart”cellular telephone or pager, a digital camera, a component, otherequipment, or some combination of these elements that is capable ofresponding to and executing instructions or operations.

Similar to user 220, 222, 224, server system 260 preferably includes acomputer-readable medium, such as random access memory, coupled to aprocessor. The processor executes program instructions stored in memory.Server system 260 may also include a number of additional external orinternal devices, such as, without limitation, a mouse, a CD-ROM, akeyboard, a display, a storage device and other attributes similar tocomputer system 10 of FIG. 1. Server system 260 may additionally includea secondary storage element, such as database 270 for storage of dataand information. Server system 260, although depicted as a singlecomputer system, may be implemented as a network of computer processors.Memory in server system 260 contains one or more executable steps,program(s), algorithm(s), or application(s) 206 (shown in FIG. 1). Forexample, the server system 260 may include a web server, informationserver, application server, one or more general-purpose computers (e.g.,personal computers), one or more special purpose computers (e.g.,devices specifically programmed to communicate with each other), aworkstation or other equipment, or some combination of these elementsthat is capable of responding to and executing instructions oroperations.

Communications system 201 is capable of delivering and exchanging databetween user 220, 222, 224 and a server system 260 throughcommunications link 240 and/or network 250. Through user 220, 222, 224,users can preferably communicate over network 250 with each other user220, 222, 224, and with other systems and devices, such as server system260, to electronically collect, transmit, manipulate, display, store,print and/or view bettor data utilizing betting level of profitabilitysystem 301 (see FIG. 3). Communications link 240 typically includesnetwork 250 making a direct or indirect communication between the user220, 222, 224 and the server system 260, irrespective of physicalseparation. Examples of a network 250 include the Internet, cloud,analog or digital wired and wireless networks, radio, television, cable,satellite, and/or any other delivery mechanism for carrying and/ortransmitting data or other information, such as to electronicallytransmit, store, print and/or view multidimensional digital masterimage(s) 303. The communications link 240 may include, for example, awired, wireless, cable, optical or satellite communication system orother pathway.

It is contemplated herein that RAM 104, main storage device 214, anddatabase 270 may be referred to herein as storage device(s) or memorydevice(s).

Referring now to FIG. 3, by way of example, and not limitation, there isillustrated a set of instructions for computer system 10, user 220, 222,224 and/or server system 260 utilizing betting level of profitabilitysystem 301 or flow diagram 300 of an exemplary embodiment of utilizingbetting level of profitability system 301. Preferably betting level ofprofitability system 300 may be configured as algorithm, software orapplications 206 operating and/or executing instructions or operationson computer system 10, user 220, 222, 224 and/or server system 260(shown in FIGS. 1 and 2). In block or step 310, providing betting levelof profitability system 301, preferably as described above in FIGS. 1-2.In block or step 315, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to preferably gather, collect, receive, andstore free and/or purchased bet data or bet advice 303 from bet sources,such as bet data source 302 from numerous websites or handicappinginformation outlets, in order to gain an advantage on certain bet types304, such as team or teams, risk levels, risk, position against thespread, on the Money Line, on the Total, on their Fantasy Sports MockDraft Lineup/Team, or a combination of two or more risk or positionsknown as a combo risk/bet “Parlay” or “Teaser” or Pari-Mutuel risk,Parlays Teasers and Straight bets.

It is contemplated herein that betting level of profitability system 301may gather, collect, and store free and/or purchased data or advice fromsources other than betting, such as stock or other investmentinformation (bet data) from stock or other investment informationoutlets (bet type) and apply profitability system 301 thereto suchinformation.

In block or step 320, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to assign (assigning) or determineconsistency score, level, or grade 306 to/for each bet data source 302(may be categorized by sport) and stores consistency score, level, orgrade 306 in data base 270. Betting level of profitability system 300preferably assigns a grade of zero (0, zero age) to bet data source 302deemed to be new data source with historical data of less than 90 daysin length, duration, or age (data source is 1-90 days since published ascompared Date (current date)). Betting level of profitability system 300preferably assigns a grade of one (1, one age) to bet data source 302deemed to be young data source with historical data between 91 days and365 in duration or age (data source is 91-365 days since published ascompared Date (current date)). Betting level of profitability system 300preferably assigns a grade of two (2, two age) to bet data source 302deemed to be aged data source with historical data between 366 days and2 years in length, duration or age (data source is 366 days-2 yearssince published as compared Date (current date)). Betting level ofprofitability system 300 preferably assigns a grade of three (3, threeage) to bet data source 302 deemed to be mature data source havinghistorical data greater than 2 years in length, duration or age (datasource is 365 days-2 years since published as compared Date (currentdate)).

It is contemplated herein that different percentage score, level,nomenclature, or grade may be assigned herein to consistency score,level, or grade 306.

In block or step 325, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to assign (assigning) or determine return oninvestment (ROI) percentage score, level, or grade 308 to each bet datasource 302 (may be categorized by sport) and store return on investment(ROI) percentage score, level, or grade 308 in data base 270. Bettinglevel of profitability system 301 may be configured to take eachhistorical match or game outcome based on profits earned or lost foreach individual game and sums the total earned or loss amongst allmatches within a given sport, and divides that total by the total amountrisked as a separate sum to produce a return on investment percentage bysport or category. Betting level of profitability system 300 preferablyassigns a grade of zero (0, zero profitable) to bet data source(s) 302that turn a profit of or turn a return on Investment (ROI) of minustwenty percent of 0.20 up to one hundred percent (−20% of −0.20 up to−100%), profitable bet data source(s) 302. Betting level ofprofitability system 300 preferably assigns a grade of one (1) to betdata source(s) 302 that turn a profit of or return on Investment (ROI)of minus ten percent to minus nineteen percent (−10% to −19%), good betdata source(s) 302. Betting level of profitability system 300 preferablyassigns a grade of two (2) to bet data source(s) 302 that turn a profitof or return on Investment (ROI) of minus one percent to minus ninepercent (−1% and −9%), marginal bet data source(s) 302. Betting level ofprofitability system 300 preferably assigns a grade of three (3) to betdata source(s) 302 that turn a profit of or a return on Investment (ROI)of zero to one hundred percent (0% up to 100%), poor bet data source(s)302.

It is contemplated herein that different percentage score, level, orgrade may be assigned herein to return on investment (ROI) percentagescore, level, or grade 308.

In block or step 330, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to formulate (formulating) or assign(assigning) or determine overall efficiency score 310 with regards to orbetween or utilizing return on investment (ROI) percentage score, level,or grade 308 and consistency score, level, or grade 306 to each bet datasource 302 (may be categorized by sport) and store return on investment(ROI) percentage score, level, or grade 308 in data base 270. Bettinglevel of profitability system 301 may assign (assigning) or formulate anoverall efficiency score 310 by selecting data sources 302 withconsistency score, level, or grade 306 of one (1, one age), two (2, twoage), or three (3, three age) and assigning them overall efficiencyscore 310 for all data sources 302 with consistency score, level, orgrade 306 of three (3, three age) and return on investment (ROI)percentage score, level, or grade 308 of zero (0, zero ROI) may beassigned overall efficiency score 310 of zero (0, zero overallefficiency score).

Moreover, return on investment (ROI) percentage score, level, or grade308 of one (1, one ROI) may be assigned overall efficiency score 310 ofthree (3, three overall efficiency score), return on investment (ROI)percentage score, level, or grade 308 of two (2, two ROI) may beassigned overall efficiency score 310 of six (6, six overall efficiencyscore), and return on investment (ROI) percentage score, level, or grade308 of three (3, three ROI) may be assigned overall efficiency score 310of nine (9, nine overall efficiency score).

Betting level of profitability system 301 may assign or formulate anoverall efficiency score 310 by selecting data sources 302 withconsistency score, level, or grade 306 of two (2, two age) and return oninvestment (ROI) percentage score, level, or grade 308 such as zero (0,zero ROI) may be assigned overall efficiency score 310 of zero (0, zerooverall efficiency score),

Moreover, return on investment (ROI) percentage score, level, or grade308 of one (1, one ROI) may be assigned overall efficiency score 310 oftwo (2, two overall efficiency score), return on investment (ROI)percentage score, level, or grade 308 of two (2, two ROI) may beassigned overall efficiency score 310 of four (4, four overallefficiency score), and return on investment (ROI) percentage score,level, or grade 308 of three (3, three ROI) may be assigned overallefficiency score 310 of six (6).

Betting level of profitability system 301 may formulate an overallefficiency score 310 by selecting data sources 302 with consistencyscore, level, or grade 306 of one (1, one age) and return on investment(ROI) percentage score, level, or grade 308 of zero (0, zero ROI) may beassigned overall efficiency score 310 of zero (0, zero overallefficiency score).

Moreover, return on investment (ROI) percentage score, level, or grade308 of one (1, one ROI) may be assigned overall efficiency score 310 ofone (1, one overall efficiency score), return on investment (ROI)percentage score, level, or grade 308 of two (2, two ROI) may beassigned overall efficiency score 310 of two (2), and return oninvestment (ROI) percentage score, level, or grade 308 of three (3) maybe assigned overall efficiency score 310 of three (3).

In block or step 335, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to select (selecting) data source 302 withoverall efficiency score 310 (may be categorized by sport) four (4) orhigher and store data source 302 in data base 270. It is contemplatedherein that values or thresholds different than four (4) or higher maybe selected herein.

In block or step 340, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to utilize (utilizing) data source(s) 302with overall efficiency score 310 (may be categorized by sport) of four(4) or higher to make current days bets or play request from user 220,222, 224 based on data source(s) 302 related thereto the informationuser 220, 222, 224 requested such as team, risk/wager type such asparlay or straight position or player information for fantasy sports.Preferably, data source(s) 302 with overall efficiency score 310 (may becategorized by sport) of four (4) or higher for team, risk/wager typesuch as parlay or straight position or player information for fantasysports or the like.

In block or step 345, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to assign (assigning) or determine riskamount 316 bankroll logic grading factor 312 thereto total bankroll orinvestment 314 entered by user 220, 222, 224 (amount to be bet). Bettinglevel of profitability system 301 may assign or determine (assigning orbet or put at risk) one percent (1%) of total bankroll or investment 314entered by user 220, 222, 224 (amount to be bet) to positions or playsor bets with overall efficiency score 310 (may be categorized by sport)of four (4), two percent (2%) of total bankroll or investment 314entered by user 220, 222, 224 (amount to be bet) to positions or playsor bets with overall efficiency score 310 (may be categorized by sport)of six (6), or three percent (3%) total bankroll or investment 314entered by user 220, 222, 224 (amount to be bet) to positions or playsor bets with overall efficiency score 310 (may be categorized by sport)of nine (9). It is contemplated herein that values or thresholdsdifferent than the percentage (%) of total bankroll or investment 314may be selected herein.

In block or step 350, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to track (tracking) performance of datasource(s) 302 resulting in losing positons/picks/wagers or performanceof current bets or play request from user 220, 222, 224 based on datasource(s) 302 related thereto the information user 220, 222, 224requested such as team, risk/wager type such as parlay or straightposition or player information for fantasy sports resulting in losingpositons/picks/wagers.

In block or step 355, configuring betting level of profitability system301 (or may be configured) to increase (increasing, detrimentallyincrement or up) assign, or determine risk amount 316 by thresholdpercentage 318, such as one percent (1%) on the next day's or subsequentpositons/picks/wagers data source(s) 302, which resulted in losingpositons/picks/wagers. It is contemplated herein that values orthresholds different than the risk amount percent (%) may be selectedherein.

Betting level of profitability system 301 may be configured to identifyor determine previous days winnings 320 and identify or determineprevious days losing 322 positions/picks/wagers and keep/maintain/removethose data source(s) 302 from next day's or subsequentpositons/picks/wagers data source(s) 302 for that user 220, 222, 224.

Referring now to FIG. 4, by way of example, and not limitation, there isillustrated a block diagram 400 of an exemplary embodiment of utilizingbetting level of profitability system 301. Preferably betting level ofprofitability system 300 may be configured as algorithm, software orapplications 206 operating and/or executing instructions or operationson computer system 10, user 220, 222, 224 and/or server system 260(shown in FIGS. 1 and 2). Betting level of profitability system 301 maybe configured to track, calculate, assign, determine, or manipulate dataentries relative to other data entries, such as bet data source(s) 302,bet types 304, assign or determine consistency score, level, or grade306, assign or determine return on investment (ROI) percentage score,level, or grade 308, assign or determine overall efficiency score 310,assign or determine bankroll logic grading factor 312, assign ordetermine total bankroll or investment 314, assign or determine riskamount 316, assign or determine risk amount 316 by threshold percentage318, identify or determine previous days winnings 320, identify ordetermine previous days losing 322, and biometric data 324. It iscontemplated herein that data entries different than data entriesidentified herein may be selected herein and may be tracked, calculated,assigned, determined, or manipulated by betting level of profitabilitysystem 300.

Referring now to FIG. 5, by way of example, and not limitation, there isillustrated a system or subsystem biometric device 500 of an exemplaryembodiment of utilizing betting level of profitability system 301.Preferably betting level of profitability system 300 may be configuredto sense, collect, store, and utilize real time biometric data 324 viaI/O devices 212, algorithm, software or applications 206 operatingand/or executing instructions or operations on computer system 10, user220, 222, 224 and/or server system 260 (shown in FIGS. 1 and 2). I/Odevices 212 may include one or more biometric sensors 501, such asbiometric sensor 1 511, biometric sensor 2 512, biometric sensor 3 513,and audio/video capture device 520, which may include sports predictionglasses, goggles, synchronized FITBIT, or other like commerciallyavailable system or subsystem biometric device 500. System or subsystembiometric device 500 may be utilized to sense, read, and collectbiometric data 324, such as voice commands, eye movements, muscletension, hear rate, temperature, reverse view pupil changes, forwardview environment information (such as to detect TV/monitor programming,game, match or mock draft player stat), oxygen levels, eye movements,voice activations, whether positioned on, internal, or proximate user220, 222, 224.

Preferably betting level of profitability system 300 may be configuredas algorithm, software or applications 206 operating and/or executinginstructions or operations on computer system 10, user 220, 222, 224and/or server system 260 (shown in FIGS. 1 and 2). Betting level ofprofitability system 301 may be configured to collect and utilizebiometric data 324 via one or more biometric sensors 501 to collectinput variables as described in betting level of profitability system300 by selecting bet types 304 via biometric data 324 to automaticallylevy risk positions or risk amounts 316 or adjust (adjusting) levy riskpositions or risk amounts 316 or other variables or data points hereinwith, for example, sports book based on returned biometric data 324and/or selection by user 220. Once the event or events of bet types 304have begun betting level of profitability system 300 may collect andutilize biometric data 324 of user 220 engaged in a television or livesporting event or events of bet types 304 to automatically adjust orchange (adjusting) course of direction of levy risk positions, set risklevels, or risk amounts 316 positions established before the eventstarted.

For example, biometric sensors 501, such as FITBIT, may be synchronizedwith betting level of profitability system 300 or glasses in order tocommunicate biometric data 324, such as heart rate along with oxygenlevels mixed with the monitored activity of the users eye and pupils,mixing that activity with the information and data being viewed in orderto make a decision to change course of direction on originally set risklevels and positions established before the event started. Betting levelof profitability system 300 may detect certain levels of euphoricexcitement in comparison to, panic or pure calculations. Thesynchronized betting level of profitability system 300 voice activationsmay deliver audio or visual suggestions based on biometric data 324described, as betting level of profitability system 300 of tracking,scoring and assessing profit levels exceed the historical averages.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may utilize biometric data 324of user 220 to determine levels of euphoric excitement in comparison to,panic or pure calculations adjust or change course of direction of levyrisk positions, set risk levels, or risk amounts 316.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may be utilized to achieve aprofessional status in the field of competitive predictions or sportspredictions by accessing user 220 social media platforms and assessing aposition on one side or the other of a specific match, competition orrace.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may access user 220 socialmedia platforms activities and assessing a position on one side or theother of a specific match, competition or race to determine levels ofeuphoric excitement in comparison to, panic or pure calculations adjustor change course of direction of levy risk positions, set risk levels,or risk amounts 316.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may compensate 326 user 220for performance through any type of asset exchange including block chaintechnology means and host any betting company may compensate 326 user220 for performance above historical averages.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may be configured to trickleor separate out bet types 304. For example, betting level ofprofitability system 300 may elect or pick from bet data source(s) 302,such as graded bet data source A, B, C, D, E, F and betting level ofprofitability system 300 may display or present user 220 (who wants)with a two team parlay (multi-team parley), such as one high grades pickfrom bet data source A (bet data source(s) 302) and pair with a pickfrom bet data source E (bet data source(s) 302). As another alternativeexample, user 222 who wants a two team parlay, betting level ofprofitability system 300 may elect or pick from bet data source(s) 302and may display or present user 222 with a two team parlay, such as apick from bet data source B (bet data source(s) 302) and bet data sourceF (bet data source(s) 302). It is contemplated herein that betting levelof profitability system 300 may display or present users 220 with picksor bets from any number or variety of bet data source(s) 302 and/ormulti team parlay from any number or variety of bet data source(s) 302.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may compensate 326 user 220via host gambling company user 224 for performance above historicalaverages.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may levy compensation orpyramid equity user 220 via host gambling company user 224 forperformance of over performing or underperforming users 220 as there arevalues on both sides, whether host gambling company user 224 would liketo solicit services to users 220 in order to gain or grow customer base,or if host gambling company user 224 is looking to make profits oninvestment capital being controlled by holding firm or hedge firm.

Betting level of profitability system 300 may be utilized by governmentbodies or Leagues looking to monitor the compliance, regulations andintegrity of each user or betting company involved in order to protectconsumers from unfair or unethical practices. When it comes to theactual use and function of betting level of profitability system 300utilized by the sports betting companies or government agencies, thebiometric sensors 501, such as glasses and FITBIT would visually see andhear the input variables specified by the betting company or governmentuser when it comes to the level of performance they are looking tocategorize by each sports bettor or professional bettor and would beable to see different performance categories in correlation to thebiometrics being gathered by biometric sensors 501. Betting level ofprofitability system 300 may utilize biometric data 324 of thegovernment or betting company user in order to levy instructions basedon defined law, or simply company policy or targets when it comes to themarketing goal or strategy.

It is contemplated herein that computer system 10, user 220, 222, 224,and/or server system 260 may execute any of the steps in the flowchartsherein for inputting, storing, analyzing, reporting, transmission, andtrending of betting level of profitability system 301.

It is further contemplated herein that computer system 10, user 220,222, 224, and/or server system 260 may provide transmission of articles,audio, text message, and video relating to biometric data 324.

It is still further contemplated herein that betting level ofprofitability system 300 may be utilized by user 220 to become aprofessional in the field of competitive Predictions or sportspredictions.

The foregoing description and drawings comprise illustrative embodimentsof the present disclosure. Having thus described exemplary embodiments,it should be noted by those of ordinary skill in the art that the withindisclosures are exemplary only, and that various other alternatives,adaptations, and modifications may be made within the scope of thepresent disclosure. Merely listing or numbering the steps of a method ina certain order does not constitute any limitation on the order of thesteps of that method. Many modifications and other embodiments of thedisclosure will come to mind to one ordinarily skilled in the art towhich this disclosure pertains having the benefit of the teachingspresented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings.Although specific terms may be employed herein, they are used in ageneric and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.Moreover, the present disclosure has been described in detail; it shouldbe understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can bemade thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of thedisclosure as defined by the appended claims. Accordingly, the presentdisclosure is not limited to the specific embodiments illustratedherein, but is limited only by the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer system to raise a betting levelprofitability of a bettor, the computer system comprising: a memorydevice for storing an instruction; a processor in communication withsaid memory and configured to execute said instruction: said processorreceives a bet data from a bet data source; said processor receives abet type; said processor executes an instruction to assign a consistencyscore for each said bet data source; said processor executes aninstruction to determine a return on investment percentage score foreach said bet data source; said processor executes an instruction todetermine an overall efficiency score for each said bet data sourcebased on said consistency score and said return on investment percentagescore for each said bet data source; said processor executes aninstruction to select each said bet data source having said overallefficiency score greater than or equal to four; said processor executesan instruction to elect a current day bet utilizing said bet data sourcehaving said overall efficiency score greater than or equal to a four;said processor executes an instruction to track said bet data sourcehaving a losing position; and said processor executes an instruction todetrimentally increment a risk amount of said bet data source for asubsequent bet.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein said processorexecutes an instruction to assign a zero age to a new said bet datasource.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein said processor executes aninstruction to assign a one age to a young said bet data source.
 4. Thesystem of claim 3, wherein said processor executes an instruction toassign a two age to an aged said bet data source.
 5. The system of claim4, wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign a three ageto a mature said bet data source.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein saidprocessor executes an instruction to assign a zero ROI to a profitablesaid return on investment percentage score.
 7. The system of claim 6,wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign a one ROI to agood said return on investment percentage score.
 8. The system of claim7, wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign a two ROI toa marginal said return on investment percentage score.
 9. The system ofclaim 8, wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign athree ROI to a poor said return on investment percentage score.
 10. Thesystem of claim 9, wherein said processor executes an instruction toassign a zero overall efficiency score to said bet data source havingsaid mature said bet data source and said profitable said return oninvestment percentage score.
 11. The system of claim 10, wherein saidprocessor executes an instruction to assign a three overall efficiencyscore to said bet data source having said poor said return on investmentpercentage score.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein said processorexecutes an instruction to assign a six overall efficiency score to saidbet data source having said marginal said return on investmentpercentage score.
 13. The system of claim 11, wherein said processorexecutes an instruction to assign a nine overall efficiency score tosaid bet data source having said poor said return on investmentpercentage score.
 14. The system of claim 9, wherein said processorexecutes an instruction to assign a zero overall efficiency score tosaid bet data source having said aged said bet data source and saidprofitable said return on investment percentage score.
 15. The system ofclaim 14, wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign twooverall efficiency score to said bet data source having said good saidreturn on investment percentage score.
 16. The system of claim 14,wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign a four overallefficiency score to said bet data source having said marginal saidreturn on investment percentage score.
 17. The system of claim 14,wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign a six overallefficiency score to said bet data source having said poor said return oninvestment percentage score.
 18. The system of claim 9, wherein saidprocessor executes an instruction to assign zero overall efficiencyscore to said bet data source having said young said bet data source andsaid profitable said return on investment percentage score.
 19. Thesystem of claim 18, wherein said processor executes an instruction toassign a two overall efficiency score to said bet data source havingsaid good said return on investment percentage score.
 20. The system ofclaim 18, wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign fouroverall efficiency score to said bet data source having said marginalsaid return on investment percentage score.
 21. The system of claim 18,wherein said processor executes an instruction to assign a six overallefficiency score to said bet data source having said poor said return oninvestment percentage score.
 22. The system of claim 9, wherein saidprocessor executes an instruction to assign a one overall efficiencyscore to said bet data source having said good said return on investmentpercentage score.
 23. The system of claim 9, wherein said processorexecutes an instruction to assign a two overall efficiency score to saidbet data source having said marginal said return on investmentpercentage score.
 24. The system of claim 9, wherein said processorexecutes an instruction to assign a three overall efficiency score tosaid bet data source having said poor said return on investmentpercentage score.
 25. The system of claim 9, wherein said processorexecutes an instruction to assign a percentage of an investment to aposition based on said overall efficiency score of said bet data source.26. The system of claim 9, wherein said processor executes aninstruction to collect a biometric data via a biometric sensorsproximate said user and adjusting a position based on said biometricdata.
 27. The system of claim 1, wherein said processor executes aninstruction to present a bet to a user utilizing said bet data sourcehaving said overall efficiency score greater than or equal to four. 28.The system of claim 1, wherein said processor executes an instruction topresent a bet to a user utilizing one or more said bet data sources. 29.The system of claim 28, wherein said bet is a multi-team parlay.
 30. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein said processor executes an instruction tocompensate a user for a performance above an average and saidperformance by said user is selected from a group consisting of socialmedia, forum, contest, rebate, affiliate, contest and combinationsthereof.
 31. The system of claim 30, wherein said user is selected froma group consisting of contestant, consultant, handicapper.
 32. Thesystem of claim 30, wherein said compensation is selected from a groupconsisting of currency, crypto currency, token, and combinations thereof33. A method of raising a betting level profitability of a bettor, saidmethod utilizing a computer processor to execute an instructioncomprising the steps of:: inputting bet data from a bet data source;inputting a bet type; assigning a consistency score for each said betdata source; determining a return on investment percentage score foreach said bet data source; determining an overall efficiency score foreach said bet data source based on said consistency score and saidreturn on investment percentage score for each said bet data source;selecting each said bet data source data source having said overallefficiency score greater than or equal to four; electing a current daybet utilizing said bet data source data source having said overallefficiency score greater than or equal to four; tracking said bet datasource having a losing position; and incrementing a risk amount of saidbet data source for a subsequent bet.